Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1580 (HP)

Kul Parsad v. State of H. P.

2011-03-22

KURIAN JOSEPH, SANJAY KAROL

body2011
JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. The petitioner claims work charge status/regularization. Reliance is placed on the decision of this Court in Man Singh vs. State of H.P. & others, CWP No. 1594 of 2008, decided on 27th July, 2009. 2. The learned Deputy Advocate General, points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioners submit that he would file appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so. As and when the same is made, the respondent concerned will examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment referred to above. 3. The Writ Petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.