Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1694 (HP)

Rajender Paul Thakur v. State of H. P.

2011-03-24

KURIAN JOSEPH, V.K.AHUJA

body2011
JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. The petitioners claim the benefit of ad hoc service followed by regular service for the purpose of increments, pay fixation, pension etc. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in LPA No.36 of 2010, Sita Ram vs. State. It is for the respondents to examine the matters. Therefore, these writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent concerned to examine the matter(s) in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of the production of a copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition(s) and the copy of the judgment referred to above, by the petitioner concerned. 2. The writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.