M. Sathyamurthy v. District Collector, Tiruppur District
2011-03-25
R.SUDHAKAR
body2011
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment :- 1. Writ Petition No.7671 of 2011 is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the second respondent from dispossessing the petitioner from Shop No.1, New Bus Stand, Tiruppur without considering the representation of the petitioner dated 5.3.2011 by providing alternate site. 2. Writ Petition No.7672 of 2011 is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the second respondent from dispossessing the petitioner from Shop No.12A, New Bus Stand, Tiruppur without considering the representation of the petitioner dated 5.3.2011 by providing alternate site. 3. Writ Petition No.7673 of 2011 is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the second respondent from dispossessing the petitioner from Shop No.2, New Bus Stand, Tiruppur without considering the representation of the petitioner dated 5.3.2011 by providing alternate site. 4. Mr.S.Shivashanmugam, learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the respondents in all the writ petitions. The relief sought for in all the writ petitions is one and the same. Hence, by consent, all the writ petitions are taken up together for final disposal. 5. All the three petitioners claimed to be in occupation of the shops owned by the second respondent pursuant to the auction conducted in the year 2001 and renewed thereafter from time to time. Present period expires on 31.3.2011. Petitioners in W.P.Nos.7671 and 7673 made a joint representation and the Petitioner in W.P.No.7672 of 2011 made a separate representation to the first respondent District Collector on 5.3.2011. There is also earlier representations. 6. Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for, the first respondent is directed to consider the representation dated 5.3.2011 and pass appropriate orders on its own merits and in accordance with law on or before 31.3.2011 so as to enable the petitioners to take appropriate steps in this regard either way. Petitioners also state that if there is any impediment in extending the licence to the present shops, the first respondent in consultation with the second respondent may give the petitioners any other alternate shops. 7. All the Writ Petitions are disposed of as above. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.