Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1729 (HP)

Anil Kumar v. Sat Pal Sharma

2011-03-25

RAJIV SHARMA

body2011
JUDGMENT Rajiv Sharma, J. With the consent of the parties, the present Civil Revision is disposed of in terms of law laid down by this Court in Sunita Kahol and others Versus Satpal Sharma, latest HLJ 2010 (HP) 1435. However, it is directed that only on the plans being sanctioned by the competent authority, the order of eviction shall be available for execution. The sanctioned or approved plans shall be produced before the executing court whereupon the executing court shall allow a reasonable time to the tenants for vacating the property and delivering possession to the landlord. Till then the tenants shall remain liable to pay charges for use and occupation of the premises at the same rate at which they are being paid earlier. Subject to these modifications, the orders passed by both the authorities below are maintained. No costs.