Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1818 (RAJ)

Chavli Devi v. State of Rajasthan

2011-08-26

RAGHUVENDRA S.RATHORE

body2011
JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. On having considered overall facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that the petitioners are mother in law and father in law as also the fact that the husband Yogesh has been granted bail after his arrest, I deem it just and proper to grant indulgence or anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 3. Consequently, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed. 4. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Mukundgarh, Jhunjhunu in F.I.R. No. 81/2011 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners Smt. Chavli Devi and Ramkumar they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to his satisfaction on the following conditions - (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. Application for Bail Allowed on Usual Conditions. *******