JUDGMENT 1. - This petition has been filed against the order dated 5.7.2008 passed by the revisional Court by which the order of the trial Court was quashed and the proceedings were remanded back for rehearing. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor. 3. The main contention of the present petitioners is that the revisional Court has erred in holding that the learned Magistrate has not considered the reasons of Final Report because while taking cognizance, the learned Magistrate has considered the reasons of Final Report and hence the order of revisional Court should be set aside. 4. By order 23.8.2005, the cognizance has been taken against the accused persons and in revision it was held by the revisional Court that the learned trial Court had not considered the reasons for Final Report and no specific finding has been arrived at by the learned trial Court. Reliance has been placed on the judgment delivered in Rajasthan High Court v. Bhagwan Sahai Khandelwal, 2006 (1) RLW 640 , wherein it was specifically held that when Final Report was submitted, it was obligatory upon the trial Court to consider the reasons for coming over negative report. Thus, the revisional Court has not committed any irregularity in remanding the matter to the trial Court for rehearing the matter. 5. Thus, there is no infirmity in the impugned order and it is not a case to be interfered with in extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. 6. The stay petition also stands disposed of accordingly.Petition dismissed. *******