Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1839 (HP)

Uday Singh v. Master Abhishekh

2011-03-31

RAJIV SHARMA

body2011
JUDGMENT Rajiv Sharma, Judge With the consent of parties, the revision petition is disposed of on the following terms: “Though the orders passed by both the authorities are upheld/sustained, however, it is directed that only on the plans being sanctioned by the competent authority, the order of eviction shall be available for execution. The sanction or approved plans shall be produced before the executing court, whereupon the executing court shall allow a reasonable time to the tenants for vacating the property and delivering possession to the landlord. Till then, the tenants shall remain liable to pay charges for use and occupation of the premises at the same rate at which they are being paid earlier. Subject to these modifications, the orders passed by both the authorities below are maintained.” 2.The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs.