Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1850 (MAD)

Hindustan Constructions Company, Rep. By its Manager Shri Ajay Deo v. Transport Commissioner

2011-03-31

M.JAICHANDREN

body2011
Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the third respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 21.02.2011, on merits, within a specified period. 3. The learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the third respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 21.02.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 21.02.2011, to the third respondent, along with a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.