JUDGMENT 1. - The aforesaid petition has been filed against the order dated 31.5.2011, passed by Additional Sessions Judge Sawai Madhopur, whereby while granting pre-arrest bail learned judge has imposed a condition to deposit bank draft of Rs. 1,68,164. 2. The only contention of the petitioner is that a false FIR has been lodged against the petitioner, and apprehending his arrest, the petitioner moved bail application before competent court. The bail application of the petitioner was allowed, but at the same time it has been disallowed while imposing an onerous and unwarranted condition of depositing the bank guarantee of Rs. 1,68,164/- , hence the condition should be quashed and the order should be modified. He placed reliance on the judgment of hon'ble Apex Court in Sheikh Ayub v. State of M.P., (2004) 13 SCC 457 , wherein it was held that direction to deposit the amount was not warranted, and the condition was deleted; Munish Bhasin v. State, 2009(2) WLC (SC) Cri.176 : (2009) 4 SCC 45 , wherein the hon'ble Apex Court held that harsh, onerous and excessive conditions which frustrate the very object of anticipatory bail are not to be imposed. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties, and perused the material available of record. 4. A bare perusal of the above factual scenario clearly shows that the condition of furnishing bank guarantee is not just and proper. Therefore the same deserves to be quashed. 5. Consequently, the misc. petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 31.5.2011, passed by Additional Sessions Judge Sawal Madhopur is modified to the extent that the petitioner is not required to deposit the bank quarantee of Rs. 1,68,164/-.Misc. Petition allowed. *******