Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 190 (HP)

Lt. Col. R. S. Pawar v. State of Himachal Pradesh

2011-01-05

RAJIV SHARMA

body2011
JUDGMENT Rajiv Sharma, J. Petitioner has already made a representation for the redressal of his grievance to the Principal Secretary (Home). Same has been rejected by the Principal Secretary (Home) without passing a speaking order vide Annexure A-27 on 20th April, 2004. Once the representation has been made by the petitioner for the redressal of his grievance, the grounds/pleas raised in the representation ought to have been taken into consideration by the Principal Secretary (Home) while deciding the same. 2. Consequently, the petition is allowed. Annexure A-27, dated 20th April, 2004 is quashed and set aside. Principal Secretary Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No. (Home) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh is directed to consider and decide the representations dated 21st November, 2002 and 9th April, 2003 made by the petitioner afresh by passing a speaking/detailed order. The petitioner shall also be heard in person and for that person he will be notified the date separately. Needful be done within a period of two months after the production of certified copy of this judgment. The pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No costs.