Hon'ble MAHESHWARI, J.—Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and having perused the material placed on record, this Court is not persuaded to consider interference in the order dated 02.07.2011 whereby the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Deedwana has declined the prayer for pre-mature release of a part of amount of compensation kept in fixed deposit. 2. It is noticed from the material on record that an award was made in the sum of Rs.5,52,000/- together with interest @ 9% per annum in favour of the claimants towards compensation for the death of Heera Ram, husband of petitioner No.1 and father of petitioners Nos.2 and 3, in a vehicular accident that occurred on 19.07.2009. The Tribunal directed one-half of the amount of compensation to be paid to the petitioner No.1 and out of this, 65% to be placed in fixed deposit for 5 years and remaining 35% to be paid in cash through saving bank account. The Tribunal further directed one-fourth of the amount of compensation to be paid to the petitioners Nos.2 and 3 each with the same directions of deposit of 65% of the said amount in 5 years fixed deposit and remaining 35% to be paid in cash through saving bank account. 3. The petitioner No.1 prayed for release of the amount placed in fixed deposit with the submissions that she wanted to construct the house for residence; and her daughter (petitioner No.2) was of marriageable age but she was unable to arrange for her marriage for want of money. The Tribunal has not been satisfied with the grounds as stated with the observations that Patta had not been produced in relation to house construction and then, the daughter of the petitioner No.1 was minor in about 17½ years of age. 4. Having examined the nature of award and the totality of circumstances, this Court is satisfied that as at present, the Tribunal has been justified in declining the prayer for premature release of the amount kept in fixed deposit. No case for interference in writ jurisdiction is made out. The writ petition stands dismissed summarily.