Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1968 (HP)

Suman Kumari v. State of H. P.

2011-04-04

KURIAN JOSEPH, SANJAY KAROL

body2011
JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. The petitioners are aggrieved since tenure service rendered by them in the Education Department is not counted for the purpose of increments. In CWP No. 4550 of 2010, titled Ravi Kumar vs. State of H.P. & anr. along with connected matters, decided on 16.12.2010, this court has made it clear that the tenure service will be counted for the purpose of increment and qualifying service. Therefore, there will be a direction to the second respondent to look into the matter, verify the facts and take appropriate action in light of the judgment, referred to above, within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment and a copy of the judgment, referred to above, along with a copy of the writ petition by the petitioner concerned. 3. With the above observations, these writ petitions stand disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any.