Research › Search › Judgment

Punjab High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1980 (PNJ)

New Gupta Electric Company v. Deepi Madan

2011-11-04

RAKESH KUMAR GARG

body2011
JUDGMENT Mr. Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.: (Oral) - This is tenant’s revision petition challenging the impugned orders of eviction passed against him by the authorities below. 2. Shorn of unnecessary details, it is suffice to say that eviction of the petitioner has been ordered on the ground of personal necessity of the respondent/landlord. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from Sh. Madan Gupta - petitioner, who is present in the Court states that the petitioner be given sufficient/reasonable time to vacate the demised premises and hand-over the vacant possession to the respondent-landlord. 4. Keeping in view, the facts and circumstances of the case, it is deemed appropriate that the petitioner be granted 09 months’ time from today to vacate the demised premises and hand-over the vacant possession to the respondent-landlord, on the expiry of the said period, subject to the condition that he shall make the payment of arrears of rent, if any, within two months from today and shall keep on paying the future rent in advance i.e by 10th of every month. The petitioner shall also file an undertaking on or before 28.11.2011 before the Rent Controller/Executing Court, in this regard as aforesaid. 5. Thus, the revision petition is dismissed with the observations that petitioner shall hand-over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlord on expiry of 09 months from today i.e. 04th August, 2012, subject to the condition as aforesaid and the petitioner shall be bound by the said undertaking. 6. It is made clear that in case of any violation of the aforesaid conditions, order of eviction shall come into force forthwith. It is further made clear that in case, petitioner fails to hand-over the vacant possession of the demised premises to the respondent-landlord, on expiry of the period of 09 months as stated above, the respondent-landlord shall be at liberty to initiate contempt proceedings against the petitioner in addition to the execution of the eviction order. ------------------