JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(i) That the respondents may be ordered to grant work charge status to the petitioner from the due date in terms of Mool Raj Upadhayaya vs. State of H.P. and as per the law laid down in Phool Maya vs. State of H.P. with all the benefits incidental thereof such as full back wages, seniority and pay fixation etc.” 2. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered by the judgment of this Court in Phool Maya vs. State of H.P. and others, CWP (T) No.10220 of 2008. 3. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioner submits that she would file appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for her to do so. Therefore, there will be a direction to the second respondent to look into the matter and in case the petitioner is similarly situated as the petitioner covered by the judgment, referred to above, similar benefits shall be extended to the petitioner herein also. The needful in this regard shall be done within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment, referred to above by the petitioner. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.