Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 1995 (HP)

Sher Bahadur v. State of H. P.

2011-04-04

KURIAN JOSEPH, SANJAY KAROL

body2011
JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. The petitioner claims work charge status/regularization. Reliance is placed on the decision of this Court in Man Singh vs. State of H.P. & others, CWP No. 1594 of 2008, decided on 27th July, 2009. 2. The learned Deputy Advocate General, points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The petitioner submits that he would file appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so. As and when the same is made, the first respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in the light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment alongwith a copy of the judgment referred to in this judgment while submitting the representation. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any.