JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, C.J. The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: “(i) That the respondents may be ordered to grant work charge status to the petitioners from the due date in terms of Mool Raj Upadhayaya vs. State of H.P. and Phool Maya vs. State of H.P. w.e.f. the dates the petitioners completed 10 years of service with all the benefits incidental thereof such as full back wages, seniority and pay fixation etc.” 2. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered by the judgment of this Court in Phool Maya vs. State of H.P. and others, CWP (T) No.10220 of 2008. 3. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioners submit that they would file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for them to do so. Therefore, there will be a direction to the second respondent to look into the matter and in case the petitioners are similarly situated as the petitioner covered by the judgment, referred to above, similar benefits shall be extended to the petitioners herein also. The needful in this regard shall be done within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment, referred to above by the petitioner concerned. 4. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.