JUDGMENT 1. - This appeal has been filed against the judgment and award dated 23.6.2009 passed by the Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and Special Judge (Dacoity Affected Area), Dholpur in Claim Case No. 281/2007, whereby the claim petition filed by the appellants claimants has been dismissed. 2. Brief facts giving rise to this civil misc. appeal are that on 22.12.2006 at about 7.00 A.M. when the appellants were going on foot from Gulab Bagh Circle to Railway Station Dholpur, in front of Bhargava Vatika, suddenly a Mahindra jeep bearing No. UP-80/G-1786 being driven rashly and negligently by its driver, hit the appellants. As a result thereof, the appellants sustained various injuries. To this effect, the appellants filed a joint claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dholpur claiming the compensation of Rs. 4,10,000/- and Rs. 4,50,000/- respectively for the lose suffered due to the injuries sustained by them in the road accident. 3. Notices to the claim petition were issued to the respondents. Respondents Nos. 1 to 3 filed written statements and denied the averments made by the claimants. Issues were framed. Evidences were recorded. Claim petition was dismissed vide judgment and award dated 23.6.2009. Hence, this appeal. 4. On 18.9.2009, 23.10.2009, 25.11.2009, 4.12.2009, 24.11.2009, the matter was simply adjourned. Yet notices are not issued. 5. Hence, this Court directed Shri Tripurari Sharma, Advocate, to appear on behalf of the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and he has accepted notices on behalf of the Insurance Company. 6. This Court has asked two specific questions to the learned counsel for the appellants as to what is the date of occurrence and when the F.I.R. was lodged. He replied that the date of occurrence is 22.12.2006 and F.I.R. was lodged on 5.7.2007. When this Court asked the learned Advocate that as to why the F.I.R. has been lodged after a lapse of six months, he simply replied that as the appellants were under treatment, the F.I.R. could not be lodged in time. When this Court asked about the medical certificate of any Govt. Hospital, he replied that they were admitted in a private hospital. 7. Learned counsel, Mr. T.P. Sharma has seriously opposed the same and contended that number of false cases are being filed against the Insurance Companies for getting money and some persons have made it a business. When this Court asked about the medical certificate of any Govt. Hospital, he replied that they were admitted in a private hospital. 7. Learned counsel, Mr. T.P. Sharma has seriously opposed the same and contended that number of false cases are being filed against the Insurance Companies for getting money and some persons have made it a business. Therefore, he prayes that such cases require thorough investigation so that appropriate person should be benefited. 8. For these reasons, I direct the Superintendent of Police, Dholpur to enquire into the present matter regarding the aforesaid facts mentioned by the appellants in this case. And, if he reaches at the conclusion that no such accident had taken place, in that circumstance, he will lodge a First Information Report against the persons who have filed false claim petition claiming compensation for the accident which had never taken place. 9. However, it is made clear that if the S.P. reaches at the conclusion that such occurrence took place, the appellants are free to move a simple application before this Court for revival of this appeal. 10. The Deputy Registrar, Judicial, is directed to send the copy of this order along with the certified copy of the appeal as well as award to the Superintendent of Police, Dholpur, immediately.Accordingly, this appeal stands disposed of with the aforesaid directions.Appeal disposed of. *******