JUDGMENT 1. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Criminal Procedure Code The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.131/2011, registered at Marwar Junction Police Station, Distt. Pali for offences under Sections 363, 366 and 376 Indian Penal Code. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the impugned order and the statement of the prosecutrix and other witnesses recorded during the course of investigation. The charge sheet against the petitioner has been filed for offence under Sections 363, 366 and 376 Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel submits that the prosecutrix is a girl aged about 17 years and she has gone with the accused petitioner and stayed with him for a period in excess of one month. He further submits that during this period, she as well as the accused have gone to different places like Ahmedabad, Vapi, Bhav Nagar, Pawagarh, Ambaji and Chotila and have also travelled in public transport as well. He further submits that it is an admitted case that in Vapi the accused used to go for earning in a company and the prosecutrix used to stay behind all alone. Therefore, if at all, the prosecutrix was illegally detained, she could have easily raised an alarm or a complaint to the persons living nearby. 3. The learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused- petitioner, namely-Bhupendra @, Pintu in FIR No.131/2011, registered at Marwar Junction Police Station, Distt. Pali, shall he released on bail; provided be furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 30,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs. 15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.Bail application allowed. *******