Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—This appeal has been preferred by claimants against award dated 01.06.2010 of learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur City, Jaipur, in Claim case No.1229/2008, whereby learned Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.3,10,000/- as compensation to the claimant-appellants for the death claim of deceased Kumari Deepak Meena. 2. Contention of learned counsel for appellants is that learned Tribunal has not awarded any compensation for future prospects. The deceased was belonged to a very brilliant family. She was a student of 9th standard studying in a public school and there was every likelihood of her progressing in the career. She was earning a sum of Rs.3,000/- per month out of tuitions. Learned Tribunal has erred in law in determining the income of the deceased at Rs.18,000/- per annum. Learned counsel argued that the amount of Rs.10,000/- each awarded to the claimants for loss of love and affection is towards very lower side. It was argued that instead of 16 the multiplier of 18, in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Sarla Verma (Smt.) and Others vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Another – (2009) 6 SCC 121 = 2009(1) CCR 276 (SC) = 2009(4) RLW 2785 (SC), should have been applied by the learned Tribunal while awarding compensation. 3. On hearing learned counsel for appellants and perusing impugned award, I find that for a student of 9th standard the learned Tribunal has rightly accepted the income at Rs.18,000/- per annum, and, on considering the fact that her parents were of 40 and 35 years of age, respectively, applied the multiplier of 16 which is just and appropriate, because in the event of death of a child, the higher multiplier may not be applicable considering the age of parents of deceased. The learned Tribunal has deducted 1/3rd for her self-expenses. Applying the multiplier of 16, the learned Tribunal has awarded total sum of Rs.2,40,000/- as compensation under the head of loss of income, and additionally awarded a sum of Rs.25,000/- under various other heads and also awarded interest at the rate of 6% per annum. I do not find any infirmity in the impugned award. In the result, the appeal fails and the same is hereby dismissed.