Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader (Taxes), appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal. 3. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that the petitioner has complied with the order of the Appellate Authority by paying the amount, as directed by it. However, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had also submitted that it would suffice if the order of the first respondent, dated 14.03.2011, made in S.P.No.9/11, in C.AP.No.3/11, is modified, permitting the petitioner to furnish a personal bond, with regard to the balance amount of tax, as well as the penalty, instead of furnishing a bank guarantee or immovable property security. 4. The learned Additional Government Pleader (Taxes) appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection for this Court passing such an order. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the respondents, the order of the first respondent, dated 14.03.2011, made in S.P.No.9/11, in C.AP.No.3/11, is modified, permitting the authorised representative of the petitioner firm to furnish a personal bond for the balance of amount of tax, as well as the penalty, instead of furnishing a bank guarantee or immovable property security, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs.