Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—This appeal is directed against the award passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Kota dated 5.10.2006 whereby, an amount of Rs.37,250/- has been awarded by the learned Tribunal towards compensation. 2. Contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the learned Tribunal erred in law while wrongly computing the monthly income of the appellant. At the time of accident, appellant was earning Rs.6000/- per month. Further, appellant sustained 5% permanent disability on his shoulder and leg and under this head, learned Tribunal has awarded a meager amount of compensation. The appeal therefore be allowed and the amount of compensation may suitably be enhanced. 3. After hearing learned counsel for the appellant and perusing the award, I find that there were in all four injured i.e. Bajrang Lal, Anuj @ Raja Babu, Ramgopal the present appellant and Gopal Sahu and three different claim petitions being Accident Claim Case No.517/06, 518/06 and 519/06, respectively were filed. While injured- Bajrang Lal was awarded amount of compensation to the tune of Rs.33,750/-, injured Anuj @ Raja Babu was awarded Rs.37,250/- as compensation and appellant Ramgopal was awarded Rs.37,250/- as compensation. Learned Tribunal has passed a just award awarding compensation to the injured pertaining to one accident according to their entitlement. Appellant failed to adduce evidence regarding proof of income of earning Rs.6,000/- per month and, therefore, learned Tribunal has not committed any error in assessing the income of the appellant at Rs.3,000/- per month. 4. Learned Tribunal, in my considered view, has rightly passed the award for an amount of Rs.37,250/-looking to the nature of injuries sustained by the appellant and in the absence of proof of income. 5. I do not find any merit in this appeal, which is accordingly dismissed.