JUDGMENT 1. - This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr. P.C. has been filed against the order dated 30.3.2011 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Behror, District Alwar, in revision petition No. 62/11 whereby the order dated 6.1.2010 passed by the learned Civil Judge (S.D.) and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in criminal case no. 590/08 by which the application of the petitioners for re-examination of disputed documents from FSL was dismissed and revision petitions were dismissed. 2. Brief facts of the case are that Smt. Ramoti d/o Late Shri Chand Kaur has filed a complaint regarding allegation as to fabrication of will of her mother dated 20.11.2006 Police Station Behror registered FIR No. 24/07 against the petitioners dated 02.1.2007 for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC. 3. Thereafter, investigating agency filed charge sheet of the aforesaid offences. 4. Learned counsel for the accused petitioners has contended that an expert opinion was required to be obtained in relation to admitted document from disputed document and even in first information report there is no admitted contemporary document and relying on that dismissed the prayer of the petitioners. 5. In the facts and circumstances of the case it was just and proper to send the disputed will for FSL but the learned trial court passed its order contrary to the provisions of section 45 of Evidence Act and the learned revisional court also ignored the mandate of section 45 of the Evidence Act. Hence, the disputed document should be sent against to F.S.L. 6. Hence, the disputed document should be sent against to F.S.L. 6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court on the observation made by the court below in the order dated 30.3.2011 which reads as under: " bl n'f"Vdks.k ls fopkj djsa rks ik;saxs fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa fuxjkuhdrkZx.k us fnukad 8-9-09 dks ,d izkFkZuk&i= is'k djds e'rd pkandkSj ds vaxq"B fu'kku d'f"k Hkwfe ds c;ukek fnukad 26-11-2004 ,oa ,l0ch0ch0ts0 'kk[kk cgjksM+ ,oa ih0,u0ch0 ukaxy pkS/kjh esa tks vaxq"B fu'kku gSa mUgsa fookfnr olh;rukek fnukad 20-11-2006 ij e'rd ds e'R;q iwoZ fd;s x;s vaxq"B fu'kku ls feyku djkus gsrq ,Q0,l0,y0 ls tkap djkus dk fuonsu fd;k ftls ckn lquokbZ v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us [kkfjt dj fn;kA ml vkns'k O;fFkr gksdj ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA bl fuxjkuh ;kfpdk ij mHk; i{kksa dks lquus ,oa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dh i=koyh dk voyksdu djus ds i'pkr~ bl izdj.k esa Lohd'r :i ls pkWandkSj dh e'R;q fnukad 20-11-2006 dks gqbZ rFkk izkFkfedh esa e'rd dh iq=h Jherh jkeksrh mQZ fceyk nsoh us fuxjkuhdrkZx.k ij ;g vkjksi yxk;k gS fd mldh ekWa pkWandkSj dh e'R;q ds i'pkr~ fnukad 21-11-2006 dks bu fuxjkuhdrkZx.k us mldh ekWa dh lEifRr dh olh;r dh dwV jpuk dh gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa bu vkjksiksa dks ns[krs gq, esjh fouez jk; esa e'rd ds Hkwrdky esa ftu nLrkostksa ij vaxq"B fu'kku fd;s x;s gSa mUgsa rFkkdfFkr olh;r ls feyku djus gsrq ,Q0,l0,y0 esa Hkstus dh dksbZ vko'drk ugha gS D;ksafd oSls Hkh gLrys[k fo'ks"kK dh lk{; jk; dh izd'fr dh lk{; gksrh gS rFkk bl izdj.k esa ,d ckj ,Q0,l0,y0 tkWap fjiksVZ vk pqdh gS rFkk vc eqfYteku ds fuosnu ij e'rdk pkWandkSj ds rFkkdfFkr iwoZ esa Lohd'r vaxq"B fu'kku ds nLrkostksa dks fookfnr nLrkost ij dh xbZ vaxq"B fu'kku ls feyku djkus gsrq ,Q0,l0,y0 tkWap dh dksbZ vko';drk ugha gSA fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us fuxjkuhdrkZx.k ds mDr vk'k; ds izkFkZuk i= dks Lihfdax vkMZj ds }kjk [kkfjt djus esa fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ v'kq)rk voS/krk ;k dk;Zokfg;ksa dh vfu;ferrk ugha dh gSA vr% fuxjkuhdrkZx.k dh fuxjkuh lkjghu ,oa cyghu gksus ls [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; vkns'k fnukad 6-1-2010 dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA vkns'k lquk;k x;kA i=koyh Qsly 'kqekj gksdj nkf[ky nQ~rj gksA bl vkns'k dh izfr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks bl funsZ'k ds lkFk mudh i=koyh ds lkFk mudh i=koyh ds lkFk izsf"kr gks fd izdj.k 2008 dk iqjkuk izdj.k gSA vr% bl ekeys esa fof/k vuqlkj 'kh?kzkfr'kh?kz dk;Zokgh djds izdj.k dk fuLrkj.k dk iz;kl djsA " 7. I have heard learned counsel for the respective parties and gone through the material available on record. 8. In view of above discussion and observation made by the court below I do not think it proper to interfere with the orders impugned as the same are just and proper. 9. The criminal misc. petition having no force is hereby dismissed. 10. Since the misc. petition itself has been dismissed, the stay application stands dismissed.Petition dismissed. *******