RAFIQ, J.—This appeal has been preferred dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation in the sum of Rs.36,200/- that has been awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur City, Jaipur vide award dated 26.3.2011. 2. Contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that appellant was subjected to surgery and fixator was also fixed. It was also argued that for this kind of injury the appellant sustained, Tribunal ought to have awarded more compensation. It is submitted that another appeal arising out of the same award is pending before this Court. 3. On perusal of the impugned judgment, it is not evident whether appellant sustained any permanent disability. Neither evidence to that extent has been adduced nor any certificate of permanent disability has been produced. Even the learned Tribunal considering the fact that the appellant was a labourer, awarded compensation of Rs.36,200/-, which cannot be said to be unreasonable. 4. This appeal is dismissed with the observation that this would not affect merit of the similar appeal pending before this Court.