Kumar Motors v. Assistant Commissioner (CT), Chennai
2011-04-27
M.JAICHANDREN
body2011
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader (Taxes), appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the impugned order of the respondent, dated 04.03.2011, is set aside and if the respondent is directed to pass a fresh assessment order, after furnishing the documents, sought for by the petitioner, by its letter, dated 21.03.2011, and after giving an opportunity to the petitioner to file its objections and by affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. 3. The learned Additional Government Pleader (Taxes), appearing on behalf of the respondent has no objection for this Court passing such an order. 4. Hence, the impugned order of the respondent, dated 04.03.2011, is set aside. The respondent is directed to furnish copies of the documents, sought for by the petitioner, by its letter, dated 21.03.2011, within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the documents, the petitioner shall file its objections before the respondent, within a period of four weeks thereafter. On receipt of such objections from the petitioner, the respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, within eight weeks thereafter. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.