Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—Claimant-appellant has filed this appeal dissatisfied with award dated 07.07.2011 of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.8, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur, in MAC Case No.439/2008, whereby learned Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.25,800/- in favour of appellant against a claim of Rs.6,65,000/-. 2. Contention of learned counsel for appellant is that a very meager sum has been awarded by learned Tribunal in favour of appellant as compensation though learned Tribunal has held that the accident took place due to rash and negligent driving of respondent driver and on account of which he sustained grievous injuries on his body. The appellant at the relevant time was 8 years of age and he suffered 2.75% permanent disability. The appellant sustained compound fracture in the claw of his left leg. He also suffered many other injuries. The appellant underwent treatment for six months. He is unable to climb the stairs. He is also unable to squat. It is therefore prayed the appeal may be allowed and amount of compensation may be suitably enhanced. 3. Having heard learned counsel for appellant and perused material on record, I am of the view that learned Tribunal has rightly awarded the compensation of Rs.25,800/-. Learned Tribunal, on the basis of permanent disability certificate issued by the medical board, has held that appellant has suffered 2.75% permanent disability, due to which the appellant would face difficulty in walking and performing his daily routine work. Learned Tribunal has awarded the compensation under different heads i.e. Rs.800/- for medical expenses, Rs.14,000/- for nutritious food, transportation and attendant, Rs.6000/- for physical pain and mental agony and Rs.5000/- for permanent disability. I do not find any infirmity or illegality in the impugned award, which calls for any interference in this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.