Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 246 (MAD)

R. Muthulakshmi v. Regional Transport Authority

2011-01-19

M.JAICHANDREN

body2011
JUDGMENT :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal. 3. This writ petition has been filed directing the respondent to consider the application of the petitioner, dated 27.12.2010, for the variation of the conditions of permit of the vehicle bearing Registration No.TN 31 C 5555, plying on the route Tirupur Old Bus Stand to Avarapalayam Pirivu via. Veerapandi. 4. The learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of the respondent, has no objection for this Court passing an order directing the respondent to consider the application of the petitioner, dated 27.12.2010. 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the respondent, the respondent is directed to consider the application of the petitioner, dated 27.12.2010, if it is in order, and pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs.