Research › Search › Judgment

Punjab High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 259 (PNJ)

Anju Pawar v. State of Punjab

2011-01-21

ALOK SINGH

body2011
JUDGMENT Mr. Alok Singh, J. (Oral):- This is an application seeking anticipatory bail in case F.I.R. No. 89 dated 18.12.2010, under Sections 326, 324, 323, 148, 149 IPC, registered at Police Station Dera Baba Nanak, District Batala. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that role attributed to petitioner no.1 is that she has given lalkara; while role attributed to petitioner no.2 is that he has given dang blow on the waist of the injured. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further argued that injury no.2 which is said to be caused by petitioner No.2 is simple in nature. He has further argued that FIR in question was registered after 60 days from the date of incident and cross FIR was lodged by son of petitioner No.2 against the complainant party. 3. Learned Additional Advocate General, Punjab, has fairly stated that only simple injuries were found on the body of the injured. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, present petition is allowed. However, it is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners, they shall be released on bail on furnishing their personal bonds and one surety of Rs.20,000/-each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer, subject to the conditions provided under Section 438(2) of the Code. However, it is made clear that the petitioners shall join the investigation as and when they are required by the Investigating Officer. In the event of failure of the petitioners to join the investigation, the Investigating Officer shall be at liberty to move this Court for cancellation of bail. ---------0.B.S.0------------