Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—The only argument that has been pressed by the learned counsel for the appellants while assailing the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.2, Tonk dated 24.4.2004 is that in view of the judgment of Supreme Court in Sarla Verma & Others vs. Delhi Transport Corporation & Another : (2009) 6 SCC 121 = 2009(1) CCR 276 (SC) = 2009(4) RLW 2785 (SC), 1/5th should have been deducted towards the own expenses of the deceased as number of dependents are seven, whereas 1/3rd has wrongly been deducted by the learned Tribunal contrary to the aforesaid judgment. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation has opposed the appeal but could not controvert the ratio of the judgment in Sarla Verma supra. 3. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties and perused the award, I find that in view of judgment of Supreme Court in Sarla Verma supra, 1/5th should have been deducted towards the own expenses of the deceased instead of 1/3rd. 4. The appeal is allowed in part. The award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.2, Tonk dated 24.4.2004 is modified in terms that as dependents are seven, 1/5th is directed to be deducted towards the own expenses of the deceased. The compensation is computed as follows:- (a) 2100 divided by 1/5th = Rs.420/- (b) 2100-420 = Rs.1680/- p.m. (c) 1680 x 12 x 15 = Rs.3,02,400/-. (d) The award on other non-pecuniary heads in the sum of Rs.45,000/- (Rs.10,000/- for loss of consortium, Rs.30,000/- for loss of love & affection and Rs.5,000/- for funeral expenses) is maintained. (e) Rs.3,02,400/- + Rs.45,000/- = Rs.3,47,400/- (f) The award of Rs.2,97,000/- is thus enhanced to Rs.3,47,400/-. (g) The appellants are entitled to receive interest on the enhanced amount of compensation of Rs.50,400/- (3,47,400-2,97,000) @7.5% from the date of filing claim petition. The record be transmitted back to the Tribunal forthwith.