RAFIQ, J.—Delay of 97 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 2. The application u/s.5 of the Limitation Act is allowed. 3. In this appeal, the State has come up against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated 24.3.2011 wherein the claimant aged 25 years sustained injury leading to 12% permanent disability. The Tribunal accepted his income to be Rs.2400 per month and on that basis for the permanent disability of 12% awarded a sum of Rs.58,752. On other heads such as for medical treatment, he was awarded Rs. 32,854, loss of income Rs.4,800, Rs.1500 for nutritious diet, Rs.11,000 has been awarded for pain and suffering for seven injuries, including one grievous injury. Thus a total compensation of Rs.1,08,906/- was awarded. Learned counsel for the appellants sought to deny the involvement of the police vehicle and argued that in fact the accident took place due to trolla and since the police vehicle arrived there immediately thereafter, the people who were present their mistook this police jeep to be responsible for the accident and police personnels in the jeep were subjected to beating and some of them sustained injuries. 4. On hearing learned counsel for the appellants and perusing the impugned award, I do not find any substance in the arguments. The accident has been proved by AW-1 Murari, the claimant who has said that he was going on Scooter and this jeep hit him as a result of which he and his brother sustained injuries. The injury report and the disability certificate have been produced on record. The evidence also shows that when the accident took place, the number of people assembled and raised protest. The suggestion of involvement of trolla has not been accepted by the Tribunal because same could not be proved by any reliable evidence. For the kind of disability, award of Rs.58,752 cannot be said to be either excessive or unreasonable. I do not find any merit in this appeal, which is accordingly dismissed.