Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—This appeal has been filed by the non-claimants/appellants assailing the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated 23.7.2004 awarding compensation to the tune of Rs.52,000/- to the claimant-respondent only on the ground that accident took place on 10.4.2000 and the injury report was prepared on the same day, which is on record as Exh.3 but the x-ray was got conducted on 5.9.2000 and the x-ray report was prepared still thereafter on 25.9.2000. This raises a serious doubt about the fractures suffered by the claimant-respondent. Learned counsel argued that even if there are fractures of clavicle bone and ribs of claimant-Badri Lal, the appellants cannot be held responsible for these injuries, which has not been proved whether those injuries were received by the claimant from the accident involving his vehicle. 2. Learned counsel for the claimant-respondent has opposed the appeal and argued that he remained hospitalized and x-ray report clearly proved the old fracture that relate to the period of accident in question. 3. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the award, I find that 11% disability was not accepted by the Tribunal but the fact remains that there are fractures of clavicle bone and second to seventh ribs. It is true that the injury report was prepared on 10.4.2000 and the x-ray was conducted on 5.9.2000 but the medical jurist has clearly indicated that the fracture of clavicle bone was old fracture and fractures of second to seventh ribs was also old and age of the fracture was more than six weeks. In the light of this evidence, Tribunal in my therefore did not commit any error in law. 4. Appeal is dismissed, Remaining amount be disbursed to the claimant-respondent.