Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—This is a case in which the deceased was aged 18 years. The Tribunal has on consideration of all the aspects awarded a sum of Rs.2,25,000/- as compensation with recovery rights to the insurance company. 2. Shri Deepak Khandelwal, learned counsel for the appellants had cited the judgment of this Court in P.S. Somanathan & Ors. vs. District Insurance Officer & Anr.-2011(1) TAC 861 (SC) = 2011(1) CCR 299 (SC) and argued that multiplier should be adopted on the basis of age of deceased and not on the basis of age of father. 3. On the contrary, Shri Deepak Goyal, learned counsel for the respondent has cited the judgment of National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Shyam Singh & Ors.-2011(3) TAC 625 (SC) = 2012(1) CCR 1132 (SC) to say that multiplier should be adopted on the basis of age of parents of deceased. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, I find that already the Tribunal has taken the income of the deceased to be Rs.2,000 per month and on that applied the multiplier of 13 as per the age of the father, who was aged 48 years and also awarded some amount under non pecuniary heads, therefore, total Rs.2,25,000/- has been awarded as compensation. However, this Court considers it appropriate to marginally enhance the amount of compensation by Rs.25,000. Thus the amount of compensation is enhanced from Rs.2,25,000 to Rs.2,50,000. The appellants are also entitled to interest @ 7.5% per annum on the enhanced amount from the date of filing of claim petition. The insurance company shall be however entitled to recover the same from the owner. 5. The appeal is accordingly allowed in part.