Hon'ble RAFIQ, J.—This appeal is preferred by the claimants against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated 29.4.2010. 2. Shri Gajendra Singh Rathore, learned counsel for the appellant has argued that even if bogus insurance policy has been issued in the name of the offending vehicle and this much has been admitted even by NAW-1 S.N. Meena, the Branch Manager of the insurance company that the said policy was issued by making manipulation in the computer system by somebody, therefore, insurance company should be liable to pay compensation to the claimants and recover the same from the owner. 3. In the facts of this nature when this has been proved that the insurance policy was forged, no liability can be fastened on the insurance company to indemnify the owner. Even if the owner himself is a victim anybody lies elsewhere that cannot be a reason to compel the insurance company to pay the compensation. 4. I therefore do not find any merit in this appeal, which is accordingly dismissed.