Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 2729 (RAJ)

Jainagar Grah Nirman Sahkari Samiti Ltd. v. Urban Improvement Trust, Ajmer

2011-12-12

TARA CHAND SAHARAN

body2011
lgkj.k] lnL;-&izkFkhZ }kjk ;g utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= /kkjk 229 jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ds rgr e.My dh ,dyihB }kjk fuxjkuh la[;k 6331@2008 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 18-5-2010 ds fo:) izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA 2- izdj.k ds la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gSa fd izkFkhZ }kjk e.My dh ,dyihB }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 18-5-2010 ds fo:) ;g utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= /kkjk 96 flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk ds izkFkZuk i= ds lkFk izLrqr dh x;h gSA 3- ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ us utjlkuh eheksa esa mYysf[kr rF;ksa dks viuh cgl esa nksgjkrs gq, dFku fd;k fd ekuuh; [k.MihB }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; U;k;] fu;e ,oa fjdkWMZ ds foijhr gksus ls dkfcy fujLruh; gSA mudk dFku gS fd ekuuh; [k.MihB }akjk ikfjr fu.kZ; esa ,slh egRoiw.kZ =qfV;ka jg xbZ gS tks izFke n`"V;k gh fjdkMZ ij ifjyf{kr gksrh gS] ftlds dkj.k ekuuh; ,dyihB }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; iqujkoyksdu ;ksX; gksus ls fujLr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ }kjk /kkjk 96 tkIrk nhokuh ds izkFkZuk i= ij cgl djrs gq, dFku fd;k fd izkFkhZ }kjk fookfnr vkjkth [kkrsnkj ls Ø; dh Fkh rFkk vkt Hkh dCts esa gSA izkFkhZ O;fFkr i{kdkj gS rFkk mls lquokbZ dk volj fn;s fcuk gh fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA vr% izkFkhZ dks utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;s tkus dh Lohd`fr iznku dh tkosA blds lkFk gh /kkjk 5 fe;kn vf/kfu;e ds izkFkZuk i= ij cgl djrs gq, ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ us izkFkZuk i= esa of.kZr rF;ksa dks nksgjkrs gq, utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djus esa gqbZ nsjh dks {kek fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA vUr esa ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ }kjk utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= dks Lohdkj dj ikfjr fu.kZ; dks fujLr djus dh izkFkZuk dh gSA 4- blds foijhr ;ksX; vf/koDrk vizkFkhZx.k us ikfjr fu.kZ; dks fof/klEer crkrs gq, utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= dks [kkfjt fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dhA mudk dFku gS fd izkFkhZ ewy okn ,oa vihy esa i{kdkj ugha Fkk rFkk izkFkhZ dk fookfnr vkjkth esa fdlh izdkj dk vf/kdkj fufgr ugha gSA izkFkhZ }kjk ;g Hkh Li"V ugha fd;k x;k gS fd og fdlh izdkj ikfjr fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gSA izkFkhZ dks utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djus dk dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha gSA vius dFku ds leFkZu esa ;ksX; vf/koDrk vizkFkhZx.k }kjk vkjvkjMh 1988 ist 64 ds U;kf;d n`"VkUr dk m)j.k izLrqr fd;kA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd izkFkhZ }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 18-5-2010 ds fo:) utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= fnukad 17-2-2011 dks izLrqr fd;k x;k gS rFkk /kkjk 5 fe;kn vf/kfu;e ds izkFkZuk esa nsjh ckcr i;kZIr ,oa ln~Hkkfod dkj.kksa dks mYys[k ugha gSA 5- geus mHk; i{k ds ;ksX; vf/koDrkx.k }kjk izLrqr rdksZ dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= esa mYysf[kr vk{ksiksa dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u ,oa euu fd;k gSA 6- loZizFke /kkjk 5 fe;kn vf/kfu;e ds izkFkZuk i= ij lgkuqHkwfriw.kZ :[k viukrs gq, izkFkhZ dh vksj ls utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= ds lkFk izLrqr izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr /kkjk 96 tkIrk nhokuh ij fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k tkuk mfpr le>rs gSaA 7- izdj.k esa ;g Lohd`r fLFkfr gS fd izkFkhZ fuxjkuh esa i{kdkj ugha Fkh] uk gh v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds le{k i{kdkj FkkA ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ }kjk /kkjk 96 tkIrk nhokuh ds izkFkZuk i= esa of.kZr rF;ksa ds lEcU/k esa ,slh dksbZ nLrkosth lk{; izLrqr ugha dh x;h gS ftlls mUgsa O;fFkr i{kdkj gksuk ekuk tk ldsA ;gka ge ;ksX; vf/koDrk vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUr vkjvkjMh 1988 ist 64 ds iSjk 11 esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr dk mYys[k djuk mfpr le>rs gSa] tks fuEukuqlkj gS& "The learned Deputy Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State has supported the order of the learned RAA on the ground that the allottees had no right to file a review petition against order dated 26.9.1980. Reliance has been placed on 1984 RRD 848 and 1985 RRD 307 in which it has been held that a review petition can be filed only by a person who was a party to the proceedings or on who is aggrieved against the same. In 1978 RRD 240 it has been held that a person who was not himself a party to the proceedings can point out the error apparent on the face of the record and the Court can review the order suo moto. A perusal of Order 47 Rule 21 shows that any person considering himself aggrieved by the order can file a review petition but under Section 229 of the R.T. Act the Court can review the order either suo moto or on the application of a party. In view of the phraseology used in Section 229 of the R.T. Act a person who was not a party to the proceedings cannot file an application for review. In view of the phraseology used in Section 229 of the R.T. Act a person who was not a party to the proceedings cannot file an application for review. 8- mDr ds voyksdu ls Li"V gS fd utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= mlh i{kdkj }kjk izLrqr fd;k tk ldrk gS tks iwoZ ikfjr fu.kZ; esa i{kdkj gks ;k ,sls rRo ekStwn gks ftlls Loizsj.kk ls Hkh iqujkoyksdu fd;k tk ldrk gSA 9- gLrxr izdj.k esa izkFkhZ fuxjkuh esa i{kdkj ugha Fkk ijUrq mlds }kjk /kkjk 96 tkIrk nhokuh dk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djus dh Lohd`fr pkgh x;h gS] tks mDr vo/kkj.kkuqlkj Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; ugha gSA 10- tgka rd Loizsj.kk ls iqujkoyksdu djus dk iz'u gS ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; dk ;g lqLFkkfir fl)kUr gS fd utjlkuh ,d vfrfjDr vihy dk ek/;e ugha cu ldrh gS rFkk utjlkuh esa dsoy ml lhek rd gh fopkj fd;k tk ldrk gS ftl lhek rd vkns'k 47 fu;e 1 lhihlh esa izko/kku fn;s x;s gSaA utjlkuh dk nk;jk vR;f/kd lhfer gksrk gS vkSj utjlkuh dh vkM esa izdj.k dk iqu% ijh{k.k ugha fd;k tk ldrk gS ;gka rd fd ;fn fu.kZ; esa fy;k x;k n`f"Vdks.k xyr gks rks Hkh og utjlkuh ds fy, vk/kkj ugha gks ldrk gS tSlk fd ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk fjO;w ihfV'ku la[;k 662@2001 cmuoku lqjsUnz dqekj odhy o vU; cuke phQ ,DthfVo vkWfQlj ,e-ih- o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 15 vizsy] 2004 esa izfrokfnr fd;k x;k gS] tks vkj-vkj-Vh- 2005¼1½ ist 545 ij m)fjr gSA vr% ,slk dksbZ dkj.k ugha gS ftlls Loizsj.kk ls ;g izdj.k iqujkoyksdu fd;s tkus ;ksX; gksA ifj.kker% izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA fu.kZ; dh lwpuk mHk; i{k ds ;ksX; vf/koDrkx.k dks nh tkosA i=koyh ckn bUnzkt vko';d dk;Zokgh vfHkys[kkxkj esa fu;ekuqlkj Hksth tkosA vkns'k [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA