Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 2868 (MAD)

Sumangala Steels Pvt. Ltd, Chennai v. Customs, Excise and Service Tax, Chennai

2011-06-20

M.JAICHANDREN

body2011
JUDGMENT :- 1. Heard the learned counsels appearing for the petitioner, as well as the respondent. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal, in Appeal No.C/437/2010, within a specified period. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal, in Appeal No.C/437/2010, on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, not later than six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of, with the above directions. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.