JUDGMENT : S.C. Sinho, J.:- M.Cr.C. No. 1480/2007 has been filed by the State under Section 402 of Cr. P. C. because vide impugned order dated 21.09.2005 has stopped the further proceedings of S.T. No. 162/2005 and directed State to re-investigate the matter through Central Bureau of Investigation. The factual matrix of the case is that a marg intimation No.38/2005 was recorded at police station Multai and during investigation statement of various witnesses were recorded and thereafter a charge sheet was filed against four accused persons on the basis of circumstantial evidence and learned Additional Sessions Judge vide order dated 06.08.2005 framed charges against accused persons under Section 302 and 201 of I.P.C. Learned counsel for the State Shri Prabhat Singh has submitted that once charge sheet is filed the Sessions Judge cannot direct for further reinvestigation. Hon'ble Apex Court in Sakiri Basu (supra) at para 33 has observed thus:- "33. In Secretary, Minor Irrigation & Rural Engineering Services U.P. and others Vs. Sahngoo RamArya and another, (2002) 5 SCC 521 (vide Para 6), this Court observed that although the High Court has power to order a CBI inquiry, that power should only be exercised if the High Court after considering the material on record comes to a conclusion that such material discloses prima facie a case calling for investigation by the CBI or by any other similar agency. A CBI inquiry cannot be ordered as a matter of routine or merely because the party makes some allegation." Thus, in view of the aforesaid facts and law laid down by the Apex Court, the Additional Sessions Judge, Betul has no authority to direct State for C.B.I, investigation and impugned order for further reinvestigation by C.B.I, in S.T. No. 162/2005 is also quashed.