JUDGMENT : Learned counsel for parties are heard. It is submitted by the petitioner that the petitioner has made the deficiency good, as pointed out by the respondents in the impugned order and the petitioner be given a liberty to apply afresh with requisite formalities and the respondents may be directed to carry out inspection and to take a final decision on the aforesaid application. Prayer made by the petitioner is opposed by Shri K.K. Singh, who submitted that petitioner is not entitled for a fresh inspection dehors schedule fixed by the respondent no.1. Considering the fact that petitioner was already granted recognition by the respondent and in view of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.6146/2008 (Subhash Rahangdale Vs. National Council for Teachers Education), the petitioner institution was inspected and its recognition was cancelled because of certain deficiencies, we permit petitioner to apply afresh for recognition by completing all the formalities. If a fresh application is filed by the petitioner along with requisite formalities, the respondents to inspect the premises of the petitioner and to take a final decision in the matter, in accordance with law, within a period of six months from the date of filing of the application. With the aforesaid direction, this petition is finally disposed of, with no order as to costs. C.C., as per rules.