Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 346 (HP)

Amar Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh

2011-01-18

RAJIV SHARMA

body2011
JUDGMENT Rajiv Sharma, J. Mr. Naresh Kaul, learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, to enable his client to file an election petition. Allowed. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. It shall be open to the petitioner to avail alternative/statutory remedy available to him, under the Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 and the rules framed thereunder. The same shall be decided by the competent authority within the period prescribed under the Statute. Since the period of limitation is available to the petitioner, no further directions are required to be issued at this stage for enlargement of time. C.M.P. No. 495 of 2011. Disposed of, having become infructuous. Copy dasti, on usual terms.