Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 376 (HP)

Jai Singh v. State of H. P.

2011-02-21

KURIAN JOSEPH, SANJAY KAROL

body2011
JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, J. The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayers:- “(i) That the writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued against the respondents and in favour of the petitioner to give/allow work charge status to the petitioner on completion of his 8 years continuous service as daily waged Chowkidar from 1-1-2002 on the basis of Annexure P-1. (ii) That the respondents may be directed to pay all the consequential benefits/arrears to the petitioner in a time bound manners along with prevailing rate of interest.” 2. The petitioner claims work charge status on completion of eight years of continuous service as daily waged Chowkidar. According to the petitioner, the issue is covered in his favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 2735 of 2010, Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P. and others. It is for the respondents to examine the matter. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents concerned to examine the matter in the light of the judgment referred to above and take appropriate action thereon within a period of four months from the date of production of copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition and the copy of the judgment referred to above. 3. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any.