Research › Search › Judgment

Himachal Pradesh High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 435 (HP)

Reema v. State of H. P.

2011-02-21

KURIAN JOSEPH, SANJAY KAROL

body2011
JUDGMENT Kurian Joseph, The writ petition is filed with the following prayer:- “i) That the respondents may be ordered to bring services of the petitioners on work charge/regular establishment w.e.f. the date they completed 10 years of service, as has been done in case of other workmen serving in the HPPWD with all the benefits incidental thereof such as full back wages, seniority and pay fixation etc.” 2. According to the petitioners, the issue is covered in their favour by the decision of this Court in Phool Maya vs. State of H.P. But, the facts have to be verified in each case. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of as follows:- It will be open to the petitioners to file an individual representation before the 2nd/3rd respondent along with a copy of the judgment, referred to above, within a period of two months from today, in which case the matter will be examined on facts and in light of the decision, referred to above, and appropriate action will be taken in the matter within another four months. Dasti copy.