Research › Search › Judgment

Kerala High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 439 (KER)

FINE ARTS PLASTICS v. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER

2011-04-12

C.K.ABDUL REHIM

body2011
JUDGMENT It is revealed that, against Ext. P8 order of revised assessment, the petitioner had filed an application seeking rectification as evidenced from Ext. P9. Since the statutory application for rectification is pending consideration before the respondent, I am of the view that the writ petition can be disposed of directing that authority to pass orders on Ext. P9. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider and dispose of Ext. P9 application, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as early as possible, at any rate within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Till such time orders are issued on the rectification application, further proceedings for recovery on the basis of Ext. P8 order shall be kept in abeyance.