JUDGMENT :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the contempt petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent had submitted that the order passed by this Court, on 11.2.2010, in W.P.No.2674 of 2010, had already been complied with. 3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had not refuted the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent. 4. In such circumstances, since, no further orders are necessary, the contempt petition stands closed. No costs.