JUDGMENT This writ petition has been filed on being aggrieved by Exts. P7 and P8 revenue recovery notices issued by the third respondent requiring the petitioner to remit the tax assessed as per Exts. P1 and P2. It is contended that against Exts. P1 and P2 assessment orders the petitioner has preferred Exts. P3 and P4 appeals. Exts. P5 and P6 are the stay petitions filed in the said appeals. Both the appeals and the stay petitions are still pending before the appellate authority, the second respondent. It is during the pendency of the said appeals and the stay petitions that the assessing authority has taken steps for realisation of the assessed amount and for which Exts. P7 and P8 revenue recovery notices have been issued. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader. Learned Government Pleader submitted that appropriate orders would be passed on Exts. P5 and P6 stay petitions within a period of three weeks. Considering the fact that the petitioner has already preferred Exts. P3 and P4 appeals against Exts. P1 and P2 assessment orders and moved Exts. P5 and P6 stay petitions in the said appeals this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the third respondent to keep in abeyance all further proceedings pursuant to Exts. P7 and P8 for a period of four weeks. In the meanwhile, the second respondent, the appellate authority shall pass appropriate orders either in the stay petitions or in the appeals.