JUDGMENt Kurian Joseph, J. The petitioners are aggrieved since they are not granted regularization on completion of eight years of service. Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that regularization will depend on the availability of vacancy. According to the petitioners, juniors to them have been regularized. It is a matter for the petitioners to point out before the second respondent. In the event of the petitioners representing their grievances before the second respondent, the matter will be examined and in case any junior to the petitioners have been regularized in service, in spite of the petitioners fulfilling the required qualification, the petitioners will also be granted regularization with effect from the date the regularization granted to their juniors. Needless also to say that in case the regularization given to the juniors was wrongly done, it will be open to the second respondent to examine that matter also with notice to the affected parties. The needful, as above will be done within a period of four months from the date of receipt of appropriate representation by the petitioner and a copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition. 2. The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application (s), if any.