Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 467 (RAJ)

Mangej Kanwar v. Moola Ram

2011-03-01

SHIV KUMAR SHARMA

body2011
'kekZ] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956 dh /kkjk 84 ds vUrxZr vfr- laHkkxh; vk;qDr] t;iqj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 15-3-2010 ds fo:) is'k dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds fuLrkj.k gsrq vko';d rF; bl izdkj gSa fd ukekUrdj.k la[;k 97 fnukad 17-5-1975 ds fo:) izkFkhZx.k us ,d vihy mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] nkarkjkex<+ ds U;k;ky; esa is'k dh] ftls mUgksaus vius fu.kZ; fnukad 11-11-2005 }kjk ukekUrjdj.k la[;k 97 dks fujLr dj fn;k o izdj.k uk;c rglhynkj dks izsf"kr dj funsZf'kr fd;k fd vihykFkhZx.k dks fof/kor lquokbZ dk ekSdk nsrs gq, bldk fuLrkj.k djsaA mDr fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj vizkFkhZx.k la- 1 ls 3 us f}rh; vihy vfr- laHkkxh; vk;qDr ds le{k is'k dh] ftls mUgksaus vius fu.kZ; fnukad 15-3-2010 }kjk vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj djrs gq, mi[k.M vf/kdkjh dk fu.kZ; fnukad 11-11-2005 fujLr dj fn;k o izdj.k mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] nkrkjkex<+ dks izfrizsf"kr dj funsZf'kr fd;k fd nksuksa i{kdkjksa dks lquokbZ ,oa lk{; izLrqr djus dk leqfpr volj iznku dj loZizFk fe;kn ds fcUnq ij viuk vfHker izdV djus gsrq iqu% fu.kZ; ikfjr djsaA mDr fu.kZ; fnukad 15-3-2010 ds fo:) ;g fuxjkuh e.My esa is'k dh xbZ gSA 3- geus fuxjkuh dks Jo.kkFkZ xzg.k fd;s tkus ds fcUnq ij mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k o i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd voyksdu fd;kA 4- iz'uxr izdj.k esa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds vkns'kksa dk voyksdu djus ls ;g Li"V gksrk gS fd iz'uxr ukekUrjdj.k mi-ftyk dysDVj ds vkns'k ds eqrkfcd foØ; ds vk/kkj ij vihykFkhZ ds firk xksihjke ds uke xzke iapk;r }kjk fnukad 17-5-1975 dks rLnhd fd;k x;k Fkk] ftldh izFke vihy jsLiks.MsUV }kjk fnukad 1-8-1997 dks 22 o"kZ ds foyEc ls U;k;ky; mi[k.M vf/kdkjh ds le{k is'k dh xbZ FkhA mi[k.M vf/kdkjh us viuk vkns'k ikfjr djus ls iwoZ le;kof/k ds laca/k esa viuk vfHker O;Dr ugha fd;kA mi[k.M vf/kdkjh dks vihy ij fu.kZ; ikfjr djus ls iwoZ loZizFke fe;kn ds fcUnq ij viuk vfHker izdV djuk pkfg;s Fkk] D;ksafd fof/kd fofu'p; Mh-,u-ts- jktLFkku 1998 ist 767 muokuh LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku ,.M vnlZ cuke Jherh m"kk lkguh ,.M vuknj esa Hkkjrh; ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 ds laca/k esa fuEu fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS& "Limitation Act, 1976 - Secs. 3 & 5 - In every suit, appeal and petition if limitation is prescribed then the question of limitation is to be considered first even if the dispute is not raised - In the present cases the application u/Sec. 5 for condonation of delay was not disposed and the case was finally decided. 3 & 5 - In every suit, appeal and petition if limitation is prescribed then the question of limitation is to be considered first even if the dispute is not raised - In the present cases the application u/Sec. 5 for condonation of delay was not disposed and the case was finally decided. The impugned order is set aside and case sent back for decision of the condonation of delay." 5- bl laca/k esa 2009 Mh,uts ¼,llh½ ist 141 muokuh LVsV vkWQ osLV caxky ,.M vnlZ cuke lksenso cs.M;ksik/;k; ,.M vnlZ Hkh voyksduh; gS] ftlesa Hkkjrh; ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 ds laca/k esa fuEu fl)kar izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS& "Constitution of India, 1950- Art. 226 - Writ petition dismissed being involving the factual controversy - Without condoning the delay and entertaining the writ appeal High Court passed the various interim order- It was impermissible as the appeal was honest in the eye of law- Order passed in writ appeal was erroneous and contrary to ground on which petition was dismissed-Held, impugned judgment is set aside the case remitted to High Court to decide afresh." 6- mijksDr fof/kd fLFkfr ls ;g ;qfDr;qDr :i ls Li"V gS fd Hkkjrh; ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 ds vUrxZr izLrqr izkFkZuk i= fu.khZr djus ,oa foyEc dh ifjlhek dk 'keu Lohd`r djus ds mijkUr gh U;kf;d izdj.k izHkko esa vkrk gS ,oa rRi'pkr~ gh xq.kkoxq.k ij fu.kZ; iznku fd;k tk ldrk gSA vr% mijksDr fof/kd foospu ls ;g Li"V gS fd vfr- laHkkxh; vk;qDr] t;iqj us viuk fu.kZ; fnukad 15-3-2010 ikfjr djus esa fdlh izdkj dh fof/kd =qfV ugha dh gSA mi[k.M vf/kdkjh us muds le{k izLrqr Hkkjrh; ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 5 ds izkFkZuk i= ij dksbZ vkns'k ikfjr fd;s fcuk fu.kZ; iznku djus esa =qfV dh gS] tks fo'kq) =qfV ¼patent illegality½ dh Js.kh esa vkrh gSA gkykafd mi[k.M vf/kdkjh ;fn xq.kkoxq.k ij izFke n`"V;k n`f"Vikr dj izdj.k egRoiw.kZ ikrs gSa ,oa le;kof/k dk iz'u xkSj ikrs gSa rks rn~uqlkj le;kof/k ds ckcr fu.kZ; djus gsrq Lora= gSa] ijUrq izdj.k esa le;kof/k dk iz'u igys fu.khZr gksuk vko';d gSA vr% bl foospu ds vk/kkj ij ;g fuxjkuh [kkfjt fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA 7- fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k us xq.kkoxq.k ls lacaf/kr vU; iz'u ,oa rF;kRed fcUnq fuxjkuh esa izLrqr fd;s gSa ijUrq mDr fcUnqvksa ij ge fopkj djuk mfpr ugha le>rs gSaA 8- mijksDr foospu ds vk/kkj ij ge vfr- laHkkxh; vk;qDr] t;iqj ds fu.kZ; esa fdlh izdkj dh fof/k =qfV ugha ikrs gSaA ifj.kker% ;g fuxjkuh Jo.kkFkZ xzg.k fd;s tkus ds Lrj ij gh fujLr dh tkrh gSA vkns'k [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA