Judgment :- 1. This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 29.9.2011 passed by the District Munsif (Rent Controller), Tiruppur in CFR No.5418 of 2011 in EP No.32 of 2010 in RCOP No.18 of 2006. 2. Mr.P.M.Duraisamy, learned counsel appears for the respondent. 3. The two grounds raised by the revision petitioner/tenant before the Execution Court are as follows:- (1) The Provisions of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act is inapplicable and (2) The order of the learned Rent Controller is a non speaking ex parte order. 4. On the first ground, the revision petitioner does not canvass the issue seriously, as admittedly, the question of landlord and tenancy between the revision petitioner and the respondent is not in dispute. 5. On the second issue, it is fairly accepted by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner that an application has been filed to set aside the ex parte decree which came to be dismissed because of delay and the revision petition filed against such order has also been dismissed. 6. According to the revision petitioner, the difficulty arises, as the revision petitioner is unable to file an appeal against the ex parte order passed by the learned Rent Controller. That plea cannot be a justification for filing the present petition challenging the order of the Execution Court which is only concerned with the implementation of order of the learned Rent Controller. The application filed before the Execution Court under Sections 47 and 151 CPC has been rightly dismissed by the court below clearly holding that the issue relating to the eviction should be raised before the appellate forum and not before the Execution Court. In this view of the matter, the revision petitioners plea as sought for in the Civil Revision Petition is not justified. 7. Finding no merit, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed at the admission stage. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.