Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 53 (RAJ)

Hemraj v. State of Rajasthan

2011-01-07

MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

body2011
JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record made available to me during the course of arguments of the case. 2. Learned counsel for the accused petitioners has contended that no specific role has been attributed to them. Specific role has been assigned to accused Sita Ram whose bail application has been dismissed by this Court who has inflicted injury which is dangerous to life. The petitioners are in judicial custody since long and no specific role has been attributed to him. The trial of the case will take time. Thus, the accused petitioners be released on bail under section 439 Cr.P.C. 3. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the aforesaid submissions of counsel for the accused petitioners. 4. After considering the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and without expressing my opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the petitioners deserve to be enlarged on bail. 5. Accordingly, this bail application is accepted. Therefore, the accused petitioners namely; Hemraj, Hansraj, Dhanraj, Bablesh all sons of Nand Lal; Naresh son of Shri Jagdish and Golu @ Pawan son of Hemraj, be released on bail under section 439 Cr.P.C. in FIR No. 213/10 registered at Police Station, Kelwada, District Baran, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.Bail Application Allowed. *******