S. Kannan v. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Chennai
2011-02-02
M.JAICHANDREN
body2011
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment :- 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 4. 2. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the fourth respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 23.05.2005, on merits, within a specified period. 3.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing on either side, the fourth respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 23.05.2005, on merits and in accordance with law, if it had not been disposed of, till date, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the fifth respondent, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the representation, dated 23.05.2005, to the fourth respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.