Research › Search › Judgment

Kerala High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 593 (KER)

KENTON LEISURE SERVICES (P. ) LTD. v. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (LUXURY TAX)

2011-06-16

C.K.ABDUL REHIM

body2011
JUDGMENT Challenge in this writ petition is against Ext. P3 order, through which assessment was finalised against the petitioner under the provisions of the Kerala Tax on Luxuries Act, 1976. Contention of the petitioner is that, the assessment was completed merely based on an order of penalty issued against the petitioner, which is pending challenge before the State Appellate Tribunal. Therefore, the petitioner is assailing Ext. P3 order of assessment on the ground that the assessing authority had failed in conducting any independent enquiry or evaluation of the facts before finalising such assessment. Since there is an effective statutory remedy of appeal provided, it may not be justified on this Court to entertain a challenge against the assessment. However, during pendency of this writ petition the petitioner had approached the appellate authority, by filing Ext. P4 appeal accompanied by Ext. P5 stay petition. Under such circumstances, the petitioner seeks direction to the appellate authority to dispose of the appeal on an early basis and till then to restrain the recovery steps. Considering pendency of the statutory appeal, I am of the view that, this Court need not look into merits of the contentions raised. Interest of justice will be served if the appellate authority is directed to consider and dispose of the matter on an early basis. Accordingly, the Deputy Commissioner (appeals), Commercial Taxes, Thiruvananthapuram, is hereby impleaded as additional 3rd respondent, suo moto. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the additional 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext. P5 stay petition filed along with the appeal, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as early as possible, at any rate within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say that, while passing any interim order, the appellate authority shall take note of the outcome of the appeal which is pending disposal before the appellate Tribunal, instituted against the order imposing penalty. Till such time orders are passed by the 3rd respondent as directed above, recovery of amounts covered under Ext. P3 shall be kept in abeyance.