JUDGMENT : Sale deed on 21.4.2008 was executed by respondent No. 1 in favour of respondent No. 2 whereby 0.710 hect. of land being part of Khasra No. 297/ 52 PC No. 21/20 village Rehli District Sagar was sold. Petitioner claiming that the suit property being a part of joint Hindu family property filed a suit in question seeking declaration that the sale deed is null and void and for permanent injunction and that the house constructed there over be removed and status quo ante be maintained. Petitioner/Plaintiff affixed Court fees Rs. 2000/- for declaration and Rs. 600/ - for permanent injunction, i.e., fixed Court fees was paid. Petitioner since is not in possession and seeks cancellation of sale deed, though she is not the executant, is liable to pay the ad-valorem Court fees. This view finds support from judgment by Supreme Court in Suhrid Singh @ Sardool Singh vs. Randhir Singh & Ors., AIR 2010 SC 2807 wherein it is held: "6 ............ But if 'B' a non-executant, is not in possession, and he seeks not only a declaration that the sale deed is invalid, but also the consequential rdief of possession, he was to pay an ad-valorem Court fees as provided under Section 7 (iv) (c) of the Act."