Research › Search › Judgment

Punjab High Court · body

2011 DIGILAW 632 (PNJ)

Seema v. State Of Haryana

2011-02-23

ALOK SINGH

body2011
Judgment Alok Singh, J. 1. This is an application seeking regular bail in case F.I.R. No. 359, dated 30.08.2010, under Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Sadar, Hansi, District Hisar. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that as per the prosecution story, Om Pati, aged about 65 years wife of Nafe Singh and mother-in-law of the present petitioner had been murdered on 25.08.2010 by the accused husband of the deceased and daughter-in-law, i.e. present petitioner. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner further states that present is a blind murder and there is no eye witness. Case revolves around the alleged circumstantial evidence. Learned counsel further states that petitioner is named in the FIR out of suspicion only. 2. Mr. Gaurav Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, states that since petitioner is named in the F.I.R. by the brother of the deceased, hence, she is not entitled to be enlarged on bail. 3. The petitioner is a young lady and had given birth to a child in the first week of July, 2010 and she was named in the FIR out of suspicion that she might be having illicit relations with father-in-law. 4. Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, it is directed that petitioner be released on bail to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. 5. Disposed of accordingly.